| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 40 50 |
161. [Video] Outbreak Re:dux - in My EVE [original thread]
Originally by: Cailais Simply put the best Eve video I have ever seen. If you don't watch this at least twice, then there's something fundamentaly wrong with you, and you should seek help urgently. C. I've watched it at least 10...
- by MOS DEF - at 2007.10.30 14:48:00
|
162. Trinity Engine - Performance Effects on lower end PCs - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
If i got it right you wont be able to use the new trinity engine since your GPU does notr support shader model 3.0. This means you will run the same client as you do right now after the patch. (eve classic)
- by MOS DEF - at 2007.10.27 15:42:00
|
163. [Video] Outbreak Re:dux - in My EVE [original thread]
Omg it is really done! Downloading... can`t wait.
- by MOS DEF - at 2007.10.27 11:19:00
|
164. New Dev Blog, Nozh on Carriers Redux, Part II - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Let me sum this up quick. New dev had a stupid idea. Community goes nuts. Scratch that idea and waste tons of manhours to make carriers and motherships the same as now besides that they have to refit some useless mods for the purpose they are used...
- by MOS DEF - at 2007.10.24 11:29:00
|
165. New Dev Blog, Nozh on Carriers Redux, Part II - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Oveur Originally by: 1Of9 Originally by: CCP Abathur We're looking at giving you the ability to specialize carriers and motherships in a way not really done before. We know that some of you have never ev...
- by MOS DEF - at 2007.10.24 09:51:00
|
166. New Dev Blog, Nozh on Carriers Redux, Part II - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
It makes me sad to see that you really don't get it. I wish some of you would really play the game still. And i mean more then logging in and run a level 5 mission. Carriers are endgame eh? Maybe you should fix missions then because i only can see...
- by MOS DEF - at 2007.10.24 07:51:00
|
167. WHAT THE HELL? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Phantom Slave Everybody that's *****ing about how it was implemented on Sisi already, please don't make an ass of yourselves and actually read the dev post just above yours. The 'Carrier Fix/nerf' has NOT been put in place....
- by MOS DEF - at 2007.10.23 23:16:00
|
168. Carrier nerf panders to the elite. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tarminic THIS NERF IS INSANE! If this goes through I'm quitting, and my 6 accounts are quitting with me! You're not the only one. If this goes through eve will be lagfree because many people will cancel their accounts.
- by MOS DEF - at 2007.10.23 23:07:00
|
169. WHAT THE HELL? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Where does this stupid idea of FIXING carriers come from anyways. Carrier are not broken. They are far from overpowered. They are very damn easy to kill with just a bunch of hacs and recons. Noone complained about them but CCP thinks they need to ...
- by MOS DEF - at 2007.10.23 23:04:00
|
170. Petition for carriers and moms to stay the way they are. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Sigend
- by MOS DEF - at 2007.10.23 18:53:00
|
171. The Carrier changes are..... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Vorian Dexter The Changes are a good idea... and I would imagine are wanted by the vast majority of the player base. Fly a carrier by any chance Powdder? That's why the thread exploded to 27 pages within hours filled wit...
- by MOS DEF - at 2007.10.21 19:43:00
|
172. Supercaps, Caps, Drones and Fighters, a New Zulupark Blog - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Zulupark Originally by: pershphanie Originally by: CCP Zulupark There won't be any difference between a Carrier and a Mothership!! If this change nullifies the difference between those two ships, what...
- by MOS DEF - at 2007.10.21 15:03:00
|
173. Selling raysere's modified cap recharger - in Sell Orders [original thread]
I offer you a 2.5 bill buyout.
- by MOS DEF - at 2007.10.11 10:08:00
|
174. Nobody likes bob? - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Death Priest Originally by: Dracorimus Edited by: Dracorimus on 01/02/2006 10:19:25 O noes, we're not liked ! And this : "some ppl like em, most just fear em or what they can do to their playing time. Nev...
- by MOS DEF - at 2007.10.10 07:52:00
|
175. Reimbursement petitions: Stop the Hypocrisy - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The main problem isn't even not gettign a ship bck. The plain insulting replies are though. If you loose a ship to lag in a system where a node went down because of overload you gotta hve quite some nerve to send "we have nothing showing in our l...
- by MOS DEF - at 2007.10.05 10:59:00
|
176. Regarding the probe changes vs supercaps - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Serilla Originally by: MOS DEF With a scan time of way below 20 seconds i do see a problem here. You cannot see the probe nor can you react to it. You can only jump out evertime you intend to log off wich is not prac...
- by MOS DEF - at 2007.10.03 18:05:00
|
177. EVE Store Needs Coffee Mugs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Feng Schui Originally by: vulnevia Originally by: Feng Schui 40oz coffee mug? screw that, I want a 120oz coffee mug, that is self heated (I thought they had those in there at one point?) You want one of ...
- by MOS DEF - at 2007.10.02 12:12:00
|
178. Eve Fitting Tool - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
This tool rocks. Thanks for this.
- by MOS DEF - at 2007.10.02 10:34:00
|
179. Regarding the probe changes vs supercaps - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Kagura Nikon I don think its right to think Titans should be able to log out then later in in lone places , without an escort force already being there to protect it. Capital ships should always be a disaster solo. And als...
- by MOS DEF - at 2007.10.01 20:09:00
|
180. Regarding the probe changes vs supercaps - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
With a scan time of way below 20 seconds i do see a problem here. You cannot see the probe nor can you react to it. You can only jump out evertime you intend to log off wich is not practical and as far as i know was no option at this special case ...
- by MOS DEF - at 2007.10.01 19:44:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 40 50 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |